Thursday 7 April 2016

Darr @ the Mall




While I’ve dedicated about half of this blog to reviews of Asian movies, I’ve yet to really touch on India, or the wide, weird world of Bollywood and Hindi movies. I guess the reason would be that, comparatively, I haven’t seem nowhere near as many of them as I have of Japanese, Hong Kong, Malaysian and South Korean films. Another big aspect would be that a lot of the Hindi/Bollywood films I have seen have been pretty damn awful. Bollywood is a huge industry, but it ain’t exactly the most creative. You’d be surprised at how many Bollywood movies are just direct ripoffs/blatant unlicensed remakes of other successful movies. Stealing ideas, or outright copying movies plots (and even posters) is just a thing Bollywood has done for years.

Well it’s time to do a Bollywood movie anyway, and considering the other half of this blog has been dedicated to horror movies I might as well do a Bollywood Horror movie, because such a thing does exist. So we get Darr @ the Mall, an inept ‘horror’ movie that doesn’t know or care about what it’s doing but instead copies ideas and imagery from dozens of other movies and shoves them on screen. What joy.

 


The Amity Mall, the largest shopping mall in India, has just finished construction and is due to celebrate its inauguration. Despite not yet opening, it has a horrible reputation due to a series of mysteriously ‘accidental’ deaths of staff and construction workers, causing the locals and media to consider the place haunted. Vishnu is hired as the mall’s new security chief after the death of the previous one. The mall’s owners, Mr. Manchanda and Mr. Khan, are holding a party on the eve of the inauguration to celebrate with their adult children, including Manchanda’s daughter Ahana, various investors and associates. As the party goes on and Ahana and her friends explore the empty mall, Vishnu investigates mysterious apparitions and discovers a vengeful spirit is haunting the mall, killing those it crosses paths with. It traps Vishnu, Manchanda, Khan and their family members in the mall and hunts them down, as the group attempts to escape.

So it’s a pretty standard, familiar shell of a plot all things considered. It’s actually the plot of a few horror movies shoved together really – ‘trapped in a shopping mall’ is the premise of a lot, like Dawn of the Dead of Chopping Mall, but even the far more specific ‘ghost haunts shopping mall before it opens’ is stolen wholesale from the Japanese horror-thriller ‘Into the Mirror’, as well as it’s crappy American remake ‘Mirrors’ (which starred Kiefer Sutherland as an alcoholic ex-cop who just wants his kids). The movie even cribs a few visuals from it. Unoriginality of the premise aside, this set-up is actually pretty decent for a little horror movie, provided it has a few things: a good pace, entertaining characters, creepy atmosphere and great kills. Darr doesn’t have any of these things.

Darr has a horribly languid pace, prone to meandering detours into nothingness as it lazes around for most of its (unnecessarily long) two hour length. Two hours is a very long time in horror movie terms, and Darr uses it in the worst possible way – it takes a full seventy minutes before the film gets to the ‘trapped in the mall’ part. Those seventy minutes are spent mostly on characters wandering around, or Ahana and her unlikeable relatives/friends getting into underwritten relationship drama. When the ghost does turn up proper, it drags even more since it has another fifty minutes to get through, so you’re mostly watching characters wander around in the dark until they get killed off. Speaking of unlikeable, the characters are so thinly written and boring that I struggle to remember anything about them. They don’t have personalities and the cast don’t bother to give the poorly written and laughable script any effort. Darr also has a really distracting and confusing issue with dialogue. Characters switch from speaking in Hindi to English randomly, sometimes within the same sentence. It’s baffling, especially when they’ll start a sentence in English, then trail off into Hindi while occasionally throwing in an English word or phrase. I have no idea why they did it – to whose benefit is it?

 
Vishnu just seems confused for the entire movie, never really reacting the way that he should but instead standing around looking as though he doesn’t know where he is or what he’s doing. Which, considering the rest of the movie, might be closer to reality than one would think. According to the story Vishnu is meant to be in his late twenties, but the actor they chose for him is clearly in his forties which is ridiculous (his throat is so coarse with lines It looks like he survived being hanged several times). Sure, American horror movies tend to hire twentysomethings to play teens, but they at least look young. I assume he’s a well-known actor, because otherwise why the hell would they have chosen him? There’s nothing to his character but that’s true of everybody else. Nobody has any chemistry or charisma and nobody interacts in any way that makes sense. Why is Machanda so familiar with Vishnu when the latter has only been working there overnight? Why does the movie try and do a weird Vishnu x Ahana thing when they don’t even know each other and barely even speak?

The party, despite having at least forty people attending, suddenly disappears when the movie decides it’s finally time to get on with it. I don’t know what happened to any of those people, including the group of singers and dancers who do a little music number, but the movie decides that’s not important anymore even though it’s spent so long dwelling on it. I’d also like to point out just how confusing the actual geography of the mall is, and how the party itself seems to exist in some sort of pocket dimension. I’m not even entirely sure the party is in the mall at all – its interior is a nightclub, and there’s never a scene showing anybody heading into or out of the mall. Establishing shots aren’t the films forte, but then again nothing is. In fact, you never really get a sense of where anything is in the wall and even the scenes inside show it’s clearly empty and unfinished. It really feels like they shot the movie in several different places, with the cramped underground security rooms full of assorted haunted house junk (Creepy mannequins! Old pictures! Jars!) not fitting in at all with the sleek mall interior, which itself doesn’t fit right with the mall’s grassy exterior.

When spooky things happen, they’re not interesting. Because it’s about ghosts, that means we get every ghost cliché possible, and because it’s Darr it means it’s all scenes taken from other movies. Things move in the background when characters aren’t looking, people hear voices or sounds or see things and freak out. When people finally start dying, it’s even more disappointing. The vast majority of the deaths occur off-screen or are shot in such a way that you can’t see what is going on. Darr is a big fan of having the screen turn completely black in place of showing any action. It’s either that or just showing a shadow or silhouette of a death or the bloodthirsty spectre, since those are the cheapest, laziest way of doing it.

 
I haven’t talked yet of the spooky spectre, and that’s mostly because it’s absolutely pathetic. It’s a poorly animated skeleton lady in a smog cloud. Sometimes it looks like a creepy ghost lady, specifically the maiden in black from The Maiden in Black (because Darr will steal from anything). Other times it’s just a black cloud that’s barely visible in the black void most scenes tend to inhabit. Other than ghost cloud/lady, there are also ghost children which look just as bad. Effects work is never great in these sorts of movies, but it’s just so especially awful. Even worse are the random green screen effects used occasionally for no apparent reason. One, involving a flashback, has a characters silhouette against an obviously computer generated inferno, the flames, looking as though they came from a Playstation 1 game, looping over and over. The worst is in the finale, where the survivors try and run to safety towards outside, only the outside is clearly a backdrop that’s been placed there – you can visibly see that it’s a flat surface. What the hell?

The film is hard to watch, not just because of everything mentioned above but mostly because the lighting, framing and blocking is atrocious. From a technical point of view, this is amateur (two) hour(s), because it’s aggravatingly difficult to see what’s going on in most scenes. Most scenes are lit poorly, while some aren’t lit at all, so you’re staring at near pitch-blackness as you struggle to make out what you’re looking at. Sure, the mall is meant to be dark and spooky and haunted, but when you can’t see what’s happening then what’s the point of watching? When you can actually see, the film manages to screw things up anyway, often throwing blinding light sources in your face (Vishnu constantly points his flashlight directly into the camera, meaning you can’t see anything anyway), or there’ll be something in the way of the shot, blocking it. As such, it’s an ugly and cluttered movie. It’s abundantly clear that the filmmakers don’t actually understand horror movies or how tension and atmosphere are meant to work. Every attempt made has been stolen, poorly, from other horror movies. Darr is often embarrassing in the way it shamelessly steals ideas and imagery from other horror movies and shoves them on screen. You can often even pick exactly what movie they’re liberally copying, from the yellow raincoat-clad ghost from Dark Water, to the rusty nightmare realm of Silent Hill. None of these things mesh well, or even have any bearing or significance to the plot; they’re just there seemingly because the filmmakers saw it worked in other horror movies and decided to steal it. It’s not homage or a reference, it’s just taking bits and pieces form other films and stapling them onto your own. Even other small details, like how the mall is called the Amity Mall, are almost painful little references.

Because this is a movie from Bollywood, we get music numbers thrown in. No, it’s not what you’re thinking – it isn’t a musical and the characters don’t suddenly burst into song or sing their predicament. That would have at least been funny. Instead we get the equivalent of an obnoxious music video spliced into the middle of the film, a glitzy club-music track I assume to be titled Pina Colada, because that’s what the girl who looked like a pig in lipstick rolled into latex and fishnet stockings singing it kept repeating over and over again. It comes out of nowhere, has nothing to do with the story or any of the characters, fucks up the tone and is gone, never mentioned again. Another scene also has a music track, complete with lyrics, play for no reason. The scene seems to end and the song stops as we cut away and the film’s ‘plot’ continues for a few minutes, but then we cut back and the song resumes from where it’d stopped mid-lyrics, which is the weirdest thing ever. It’s important to note that these songs were apparently actually written specifically for this movie, because that’s how Bollywood works. The other music, from atmospherics to incidental pieces are often out of place or silly. The building-tension noises sound like they’re stolen from cheesy 80s cartoons, and any attempts at spooky horror sounds are almost like parody versions of the music from actual horror movies.
 
Darr @ the Mall is really, really bad. Hell, I’d say that the baffling, meaningless inclusion of the @ symbol in the title is a pretty big signifier of the sheer incompetence and laziness at play here (they seriously couldn’t have just written ‘at’? or just even named it something more interesting?). It’s a horror movie made by people who have watched other horror movies but didn’t understand them, but decided to try and copy them anyway. The Bollywood slant just makes it stranger, with so much obvious meddling (I feel like it was just a vehicle for that music number), that you can’t help but feel they weren’t even interested in making it into a horror movie. Maybe it was just made to be somebody’s tax dodge or something. That might explain what it’s such a hack job