As far as descriptive titles go, it’s a pretty apt one for this oddball South Korean comedy. Four bored, disillusioned youths attack and rob a gas station, trashing the place, terrorising the employees and making away with some cash. A few days later, they get bored again and rob the same gas station. This time the manager hides the money, so the four take the employees hostage and take over the gas station, pumping gas for customers and pocketing the money.
What follows is an strange night where they beat up a bunch
of people, take a lot of hostages, force the hostages to fight each other, pump
gas, antagonise customers, order Chinese take-out, antagonise the Chinese
delivery man, antagonise the police and smash up the gas station a few more
times. By the end a full-on street brawl has erupted between gangsters, angry
take-out drivers and the police.
Underneath all of this are brief snippets of the main four
that show reasons for their disillusionment. These segments give a little
insight into the personalities of the main four, which helps because there
isn’t much to most of the characters. The movie has fun with its premise, and
is fairly entertaining for what it is, but it’s lacking that certain something
to lift it up.
It’s not really about anything. Barring the central premise
of ‘guys take over gas station, hijinks ensue’, there isn’t really anything of
a plot structure. There is a gradual sense of progression as the night goes on,
but otherwise it’s a series of fairly humorous events slightly linked until the
morning where it ends. That ending itself is sort of shrug worthy, though the
end credits give snippets of what happened to each character afterwards.
There is a sense of escalation and recurring events. The
four of them continue to piss off a lot of different people, often with direct
consequences of each other. They constantly antagonise a Chinese delivery man,
causing him to form a posse of angry delivery men. Most events lead into each
other directly, giving the escalation a sense of meaning. Otherwise the focus
is mostly on the characters, which is odd because they are all pretty basic
really.The four attacking youths are the film’s heroes, and while it’s mostly a comedic light-hearted affair and played for laughs, some of the stuff they do is concerning and dangerous. They take two people hostage and lock them in a car boot, where they remain completely forgotten for the rest of the movie (to the point where it’s an honest question as to whether anybody will find them). They instigate two car accidents, beat a lot of people up and do some other pretty sketchy and dangerous stuff. While their anger and disillusionment is given some brief outlining, it’s a pretty thin reason for us to take their side as they terrorise the gas station.
No Mark, the leader, is odd. He spends a lot of the movie
basically being a villain. He’s the most serious of the group, constantly
threatening and assaulting the manager. He’s the most calm and collected of the
group, but also responsible for the more illegal plans and ideas. His backstory
might be a culturally specific one – he has the stigma of being an orphan. Honestly
it’s sort of hard to really get behind him, he’s played straight so he comes
across as a villain more than anything for the most part.
Mad Dog, the dumbest of the group, is fun. He carries around
a wooden beam that he constantly makes use of. His job for most of the film is
handling the ‘hostages’, which often involves making them lie down with their
heads on the ground. He’s probably the most fun character, as his hijinks tend
to be less malevolent and more juvenile, and underneath it he has a weird sense
of justice.
Paint is the least involved and interesting of the four.
He’s a painter/artist whose dreams and talents are trashed by his angry
traditional father who considers his creativity pointless. He does some
painting I guess, but he leaves the smallest impression of the group. There are
side characters that get more attention than he does.
Rockstar is the most aggressive by far, often the first to
violence. He spends a lot of the movie angry and annoyed at the lack of good
music, forcing some of the hostages to sing for him, leading into a random
music number (a lot of these Asian movies tend to do the ‘random music number’
thing).
The gas station’s manager can’t help but antagonise the
four, leading to further conflict. He constantly talks back, constantly riles
them up and also constantly pays for it. It gets to the point where you wonder
why he doesn’t just get with the program and keep his mouth shut, but I guess
in a South Korean context it might make sense – he’s an adult and being talked
down to and disrespected by a bunch of youths.
The rest of the characters are vaguely defined. Asides from
the constantly-suffering gas station manager, there’s three employees, only one
of which has any sort of defining features (he sort of develops a little bit of
Stockholm syndrome and confidence when, forced to fight his school bullies, he
actually wins). The majority of the ‘characters’ are the random people who turn
up at the gas station, from lazy police officers to music producers and
allsorts. None really have much of an impact.Oddly not a single character emerges as the focal point. Not even any of the main four, with the film spreading its attention thinly amongst them. You learn very little about anybody, and nobody changes or grows as a person.
It’s also has some culturally specific themes, regarding South Korea culture, where cultural differences come into play. What I assume to be a Korean phonetic word game is played by two of the characters with zero explanation, while certain quirks seem Korea-specific. The filmmaking is fine, with occasional stylistic edits. The movie almost completely takes place in and around the gas station, rarely venturing outside of its confines.
Attack the Gas Station pretty much does what it says on the
tin. A gas station gets attacked, there’s some humour and a little action
thrown in. It’s fairly entertaining but it also never really ascends to anything particularly
special.
No comments:
Post a Comment