Ventriloquist dolls are creepy, right? That’s essentially
the entire concept behind Dead Silence, a horror film directed by James Wan.
Those familiar with the horror scene should know Wan by name - he hit it big as
the director and co-writer of the original Saw, and produced the rest of the
series. While the Saw films might be considered passé at this point (Paranormal
Activity-styled found footage flicks seem to be the more popular trend these
days) at the time the series completely changed the landscape for horror
filmmaking by popularising the torture porn genre.
More recently Wan hit it real big (both commercially and
critically) with two horror hits, Insidious and The Conjuring, which betrayed
Wan’s true passion and skill – building creepy atmosphere and tension in
haunted house movies. And he’s really good at it too – Insidious and The
Conjuring are both great haunted house movies. But before those films, in the
tender refractory period after the explosive success of Saw, Wan weakly pumped
out two films – Dead Silence and Death Sentence. The latter film is an alright
and mostly overlooked revenge thriller where Kevin Bacon hunts down and
massacres the men who killed his son. But today we’re talking about the former.
Dead Silence is an oddity, and feels like an odd misstep for
a breakout director unsure of where to go. It also shows a director trying new
things – the ideas and filmmaking here are almost completely the opposite with
what was seen in Saw. It’s the early inklings of a director trying new things
and shaking out the bad ideas - this was the groundwork that lead to Insidious and The Conjuring being so good. As such, the film itself is not great. There are some decent ideas, but the execution isn't quite up to snuff. It’s a movie that
doesn’t have anything under the creepy surface. It’s hollow, much like the dolls it
concerns itself with. It also happens to be a massive rip-off of Freddy Kreuger
and his entire backstory from the Nightmare on Elm Street movies.
So Jamie returns to Ravens Fair to bury his wife and find
out who sent him the doll – he believes the culprit must be the killer. His
investigation leads him to look into the legend of Mary Shaw; famed for her
talent, she had a collection of over a hundred puppets and was obsessed with
creating a ‘perfect doll’. When a local boy went missing, the townsfolk accused
and killed Mary, who – as stipulated in her will – was then turned into a
ventriloquist doll herself and buried along with the rest of her dolls. As
Jamie begins to look into the grisly truth behind Mary Shaw, he’s pursued by
Lipton, the detective who believes Jamie killed his own wife.
There’s not much else to say here since that’s basically the
entire movie. A big fault with the film is the complete lack of meat or depth
to the film. There is no real mystery there – once Jamie gets to Ravens Fair he
pretty much instantly learns that Mary Shaw’s ghost is responsible. The rest of
the movie is just delving into why the ghastly spectre is doing what she’s
doing. The characters are all bland and lack anything interesting and even the
investigation into Mary Shaw is mostly devoid of excitement or chills. It’s
mostly all exposition until the end, where an encounter with Shaw’s ghost in
her creepy abandoned theatre feels completely ridiculous and out of place.
The town of Ravens Fair feels like a half-formed idea – a
sleepy town with aged, gothic architecture. The concept is tired, and though Mary
Shaw’s dilapidated theatre is a fun location in theory it never feels solid.
CGI trickery was used to pull off the size and scale of the place, but it all
looks and feels fake. It’s not helped by confining a lot of the film in drab
locales – we keep returning to a seedy motel room and a mortician’s office. The
film also feels empty in terms of people – Ravens Fair is a ghost town. It
makes sense in terms of plot, but it’s baffling that there only seems to be
four people total in the entire place.
This is a horror film with old school ‘rules’ to the horror.
‘Rules’ are a tough concept to nail – to work they need to be interesting, make
sense within the story and absolutely never obstruct the pace or flow of the
film. Some pull it off well (the original Nightmare on Elm Street’s dream-based
rules for Freddy are pretty much perfect). Most films fail by having nonsense,
inconsistent rules that seem conveniently made up on the spot (like in pretty
much every Nightmare on Elm Street sequel). Dead Silence actually has pretty decent
rules in concept, but it never capitalises on them leading to many missed
horror opportunities.
When Mary Shaw appears, all other sounds cease – its dead
silence as the title suggests. It’s honestly a unique, cinematic idea but the
film doesn’t pull it off. For the most part you won’t actually notice the
sudden turn to silence (though watching the film in a room full of people
probably doesn’t help). The other big rule, that really doesn’t get much
attention, is that Mary Shaw only kills you if you scream, at which point she
rips your tongue out and steals your voice. This is a missed opportunity as
they don’t use it for anything interesting. It’s not helped by the fact that
there are only four deaths in the entire movie.
It’s all very much a ‘Freddy Krueger’ scenario, with the
vengeful ghost of Mary Shaw slaughtering everyone related to those who killed
her in revenge. She even has her own creepy (if not forced) children’s rhyme
that details how she gets her victims. A common trend in Wan’s horror films is
his odd obsession with dolls. There’s the doll mascot in the Saw films, the
dolls here and even The Conjuring started with a scene that had nothing to do
with the plot regarding a creepy, possibly haunted doll (an opening scene
apparently so popular it spawned its own film, ‘Annabelle’).
Dead Silence is just a strange film in the state it’s in. Its ideas are decent, but underdeveloped, its atmosphere only half formed. The concepts are decent, but they just aren’t solid and their execution is lacking. It needed a stronger screenplay with more interesting characters and a stronger narrative. The frustrating part is that it’s not an awful film – on a technical viewpoint the film is quite well made, it’s just sadly lacking. Still, watching it you can see some of the seeds that would lead to Wan’s next big hit Insidious.
No comments:
Post a Comment